Professional DNA

Charles Oakley: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2003-04 · 7 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2003-04

The question

What kind of player is Charles Oakley?

The evidence

Charles Oakley · Defensive impact: 90th percentile (DBPM 1.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

90 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+40) · 373 players with a sample in 2003-04

Charles Oakley: what moved most is Rebounding

15 percentilcompared against: 89 percentil (-74) · Charles Oakley, from 1998-99 to 2002-03

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 3.6 minutes per game across 7 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 90th percentile
DBPM 1.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 373 players with a sample in 2003-04. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring1th percentile
1.3 points per game
Playmaking3th percentile
0.3 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact90th percentile
DBPM 1.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding1th percentile
0.7 rebounds per game

Strengths

Defensive impact90th percentile
Elite · DBPM 1.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

Playmaking3th percentile
Very low · 0.3 assists per game
Scoring1th percentile
Very low · 1.3 points per game
Rebounding1th percentile
Very low · 0.7 rebounds per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 43th percentile → 1th percentile (-42) · Playmaking: 82th percentile → 3th percentile (-79) · Rebounding: 88th percentile → 1th percentile (-87)

1998-9988th percentile
50 games · 32.7 minutes per game
Scoring
43th percentile
Playmaking
82th percentile
Rebounding
88th percentile
1999-0088th percentile
80 games · 30.4 minutes per game
Scoring
46th percentile
Playmaking
80th percentile
Rebounding
88th percentile
2000-0196th percentile
78 games · 35.5 minutes per game
Scoring
67th percentile
Playmaking
82th percentile
Rebounding
96th percentile
2001-0282th percentile
57 games · 24.3 minutes per game
Scoring
20th percentile
Playmaking
63th percentile
Rebounding
82th percentile
2002-0329th percentile
42 games · 12.2 minutes per game
Scoring
2th percentile
Playmaking
32th percentile
Rebounding
29th percentile
2003-041th percentile
7 games · 3.6 minutes per game
Scoring
1th percentile
Playmaking
3th percentile
Rebounding
1th percentile

Context

2003-04 · 7 games · 3.6 minutes per game · Percentile against 373 measured players in 2003-04 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2003-04 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.