Professional DNA

Elden Campbell: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2004-05 · 40 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2004-05

The question

What kind of player is Elden Campbell?

The evidence

Elden Campbell · Defensive impact: 34th percentile (DBPM -0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

34 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-16) · 388 players with a sample in 2004-05

Elden Campbell: what moved most is Scoring

29 percentilcompared against: 81 percentil (-52) · Elden Campbell, from 1999-00 to 2002-03

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 9.8 minutes per game across 40 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 34th percentile
DBPM -0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 388 players with a sample in 2004-05. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring10th percentile
3.0 points per game
Playmaking14th percentile
0.5 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact34th percentile
DBPM -0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding25th percentile
2.3 rebounds per game

Limitations

Defensive impact34th percentile
Low · DBPM -0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Rebounding25th percentile
Low · 2.3 rebounds per game
Playmaking14th percentile
Very low · 0.5 assists per game
Scoring10th percentile
Very low · 3.0 points per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 78th percentile → 10th percentile (-68) · Playmaking: 54th percentile → 14th percentile (-40) · Rebounding: 90th percentile → 25th percentile (-65)

1999-0078th percentile
78 games · 32.5 minutes per game
Scoring
78th percentile
Playmaking
54th percentile
Rebounding
90th percentile
2000-0183th percentile
78 games · 30.0 minutes per game
Scoring
83th percentile
Playmaking
47th percentile
Rebounding
92th percentile
2001-0282th percentile
77 games · 28.0 minutes per game
Scoring
82th percentile
Playmaking
46th percentile
Rebounding
87th percentile
2002-0340th percentile
56 games · 15.5 minutes per game
Scoring
40th percentile
Playmaking
29th percentile
Rebounding
44th percentile
2003-0436th percentile
65 games · 13.7 minutes per game
Scoring
36th percentile
Playmaking
23th percentile
Rebounding
42th percentile
2004-0510th percentile
40 games · 9.8 minutes per game
Scoring
10th percentile
Playmaking
14th percentile
Rebounding
25th percentile

Context

2004-05 · 40 games · 9.8 minutes per game · Percentile against 388 measured players in 2004-05 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2004-05 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.